Sizing versions
Multiple files can carry different chamber targets, O/F assumptions, units, or feed boundary assumptions.
RPL vs spreadsheets
Stop rebuilding propulsion assumptions across spreadsheets, CAD, and reports.
Spreadsheets are useful and familiar. RPL Engine Workbench is for the point where spreadsheet-based sizing starts drifting away from geometry, warnings, reports, and review artifacts.
Pain point
Where drift creeps in.
CAD handoff
Geometry can be rebuilt manually after the sizing file changes, creating another place for mismatch.
Review reports
Manual report updates can omit warnings, stale assumptions, or the actual solved case basis.
Semester handoff
New team members inherit files without always knowing which assumptions are current.
Connected workflow
One solved case drives the artifacts.
RPL keeps sizing, injector/nozzle workflow context, DXF exports, reports, warnings, and supported Flowfield visuals connected to the same solved case.
Assumption tracking
CAD handoff
Review-ready reports
Local Mac workflow
Use both well
RPL does not ask you to abandon every spreadsheet.
Keep spreadsheets for side analysis
Use them for quick notes, independent checks, budget tracking, or custom calculations your team already understands.
Use RPL for review artifacts
Use the workbench when sizing, geometry, warnings, reports, and exports need to stay tied together.
Document remaining review work
Keep safety review, test planning, export-control review, and qualified engineering signoff outside the software claim boundary.
Evaluate fit
See whether RPL reduces drift in your review workflow.
Download the built-in trial and test the workflow on an Apple silicon Mac.